S in the TLC transcripts were constantly significant (uncorrected and ungrammatical) and never minor (corrected and consistent with all the syntactic class regularity). The mean number of major CC violations was 2.22 per response for H.M. versus 0.13 for the controls (SD = 0.20), a trustworthy ten.43 SD distinction. 4.two.1.2. Important Omission-Type CC Violations Table 4 gives a total list of significant omission-type CC violations for H.M. and the controls in Study 2, classified by the syntactic category in the units involved. H.M. developed 0.50 omission-type CC violations per response, versus a imply of 0.01 for the controls (SD = 0.ten), a trusted four.90 SD difference. 4.2.1.three. Big Commission-Type CC Violations Table five gives a complete list of key commission-type CC violations for H.M. plus the controls, classified by syntactic category on the units involved. H.M. made 1.35 commission-type CC violations per response versus a mean of 0.01 for the controls (SD = 0.04), a dependable 33.50 SD deficit.Brain Sci. 2013, 3 Table four. Key omission-type violations of conjunction constraints (CCs) involving determiners, nouns, noun phrases (NPs), and verb modifiers in Study two organized by sort of constraint.Key Violations of Determiner-NP Conjunction Constraints H.M.: “Is it crowded and it just pointed out this bus is up here and it’s crowded school bus.” (BPC: a crowded college bus) [H.M. failed to conjoin the determiner a towards the NP a crowded school bus] H.M.: “If they don’t use legs like he does … and his hands, they could fall.” (determiner BPC: use their legs) [H.M. failed to conjoin the pronominal determiner their towards the NP their legs] H.M.: “it’s on widespread street…” (determiner BPC: on a RN 1-001 Solubility frequent 
street) [H.M. failed to conjoin the determiner a for the NP a frequent street] H.M.: “Well he’s putting the value of it and value of factor what it can be…” (determiner BPC: along with the cost of X (this) point) [H.M. failed to conjoin the determiner the for the NP the price] H.M.: “David wanted him to fall and to find out what lady’s employing to pull himself up in addition to his hands.” (determiner BPC: to see what this lady’s employing) [H.M. failed to conjoin the demonstrative determiner this to the NP this lady] Control participant: “Salesman’s speaking to…” (BPC: a or the salesman’s talking to) [This participant failed to conjoin a determiner towards the NP a or the salesman] H.M.: “I want some of that pie either some pie and I’ll have some.” (BPC: and I will have some X (cake)) [H.M. failed to conjoin the noun cake towards the determiner some within the NP some cake] Manage participant: “Woman’s telling the baker…” PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21338362 (BPC: a or this woman’s telling…) [This participant failed to conjoin a determiner for the NP a or the woman] Big Violations of Verb-NP Conjunction Constraints H.M.: “Well you–she wants a single thing and he wants another factor and also the fresh are not–are not. Does not say that, it says not.” (BPC: the fresh fruit are not) H.M.: “He had this (inaudible) … no, she’s taking that suit and he wants to take it … and he’s trying to sell.” (BPC: trying to sell it or that suit) [H.M. failed to conjoin an object to a VP including sell it or sell that suit] Handle participant: “This person is displaying the lady who’s gonna sit.” (BPC: this particular person is showing the sign to the lady who’s gonna sit) [This participant failed to conjoin an object to the VP is displaying in addition to a preposition for the lady] Big Violations of Preposition-NP Conjunction Constraints H.M.: “Before initially you cross across.” (BPC: you.