Sure with the elastic element on the sample as well as the G
Positive in the elastic element with the sample plus the G because the viscous component. In each formulations, F2 and F7, the elastic modulus (G ) is dominant more than the viscous modulus (G ) and each of those are dependent on frequency. The profiles of each formulations showed equivalent behavior in function of frequency.Nanomaterials 2021, 11, x FOR PEER Review Nanomaterials 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEWNanomaterials 2021, 11,G’ [Pa] G’ [Pa] G’ [Pa] G’ [Pa]17 of 22 17 of17 of4060040600G'[Pa];G”[Pa] G'[Pa];G”[Pa]G'[Pa];G”[Pa] G'[Pa];G”[Pa]20Eta[mPa.s] Eta[mPa.s]40020400200 0 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.three 0.five 0.7 1 1.five two 0 f[Hz] 0.1 0.15 0.two 0.three 0.5 0.7 1 1.five two f[Hz] 3 3 five 5 7 10 0 7 10200 0 0.1 0.15 0.two 0.3 0.five 0.7 1 1.5 two 0 f[Hz] 0.1 0.15 0.two 0.three 0.five 0.7 1 1.five two f[Hz] three 3 five 5 7 10 0 7Figure 9. Rheology studies of formulation F2 (left) and formulation F7 (proper). Figure 9. Rheology research of formulation F2 (left) and formulation F7 (suitable). Figure 9. Rheology studies of formulation F2 (left) and formulation F7 (correct).Formulation F2 (a) (a) Formulation FThe analysis by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is shown in Figure ten. The The analysis by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is shown in Figure 10. The a pictures have been 5-Methyl-2-thiophenecarboxaldehyde Epigenetics obtained on the day of production and d had been obtained 28 days soon after a pictures were obtained around the day of production and d have been obtained 28 days just after The analysis by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is shown in Figure ten. The production. In the course of this time, the samples have been kept at 44 C. NE droplets are clearly visible, the samples were kept at . NE droplets are clearly visiproduction. Through a pictures have been obtained around the day of production and d have been obtainedTM days immediately after 28 2 ble, plus the droplet size analysis was performed by the software of theTecnai TM G2 Spirit and the droplet size evaluation was performed by the software of the Tecnai Spirit production. Through this time, the samples were kept at 4 . NE droplets are clearly visiBioTWIN microscopic. The shape of the droplets was spherical in all formulations and the BioTWIN microscopic. The shape with the droplets was spherical in all formulations as well as the ble, and the droplet size analysis was performed by the computer software of your TecnaiTM G2 Spirit look maintained related immediately after 28 days of production (Figure 10d ). look maintained similar after 28 days of production (Figure 10d ). BioTWIN microscopic. The shape of your droplets was spherical in all formulations plus the appearance maintained similar soon after 28 days of production (Figure 10d ). Formulation F7 CTAB-based formulation (b) (b) Formulation F7 (c) (c) CTAB-based formulation(d) (d)(e) (e)(f) (f)Figure 10. Pictures obtained Figure ten. Pictures obtained working with a transmission electron microscopy. F2 at day 0 0 (a) and at 28 days immediately after production (d). transmission electron microscopy. F2 at day (a) and at 28 days after production (d). F7 F7 day 0 (b)(b) and day 28 28 days right after production (e). CTAB day 0 (c) (c) and day 28 soon after production (f).(f). at at day 0 and at at day days immediately after production (e). CTAB at at day 0 and at at day 28 just after production Figure ten. Pictures obtained employing a transmission electron microscopy. F2 at day 0 (a) and at 28 days after production (d). F7 at day 0 (b) and at day 28 days right after production (e). CTAB attested(c) and at day 28 immediately after production (f). The stability with the NEs was day 0 making use of an ocular formulation commonly commer-The stability from the NEs was tested utilizing an ocular formulation com.