Nite element model. Table 1. Validation results for the finite element model.
Nite element model. Table 1. Validation final results for the finite element model. Table 1. Validation benefits for the finite element model. Table 1. Validation benefits for the finite element model. Nature Frequency/Hz Relative Nature Frequency/Hz Mode Shape Relative ErNature Frequency/Hz Relative ErNature Frequency/Hz Relative ErMode Shape Mode Shape Error/ Nature Frequency/Hz Results Relative ErMode Shape Test Results Computationalror/ ror/ ror/ ror/Mode Shape9 of111272.94 272.94 272.94 272.94 272.1st order bend1st order 1st order bend1st order bend284.90 4.38 284.90 4.38 284.90 four.38 1st order bend284.90 four.38 bending ing ing 284.90 four.38 ing Table 1. Validation outcomes for the finite element model. ing Mode ShapeMode No.Nature Frequency/Hz Relative Error/ Test Results Computational Results2 22 2 1956.94 956.94 956.94 956.94 272.94 956.1006.80 1006.80 1006.80 1006.80 284.90 1006.five.21 5.21 5.21 5.21 4.38 5.1st order tor1st order tor1st order tor1st order tor1st order torsion 1st order bendsion sion sion ing sion3 33 3 21283.13 1283.13 1283.13 1283.13 956.94 1283.1256.50 1256.50 1256.50 1256.50 1006.80 1256.two.08 two.08 2.08 2.08 five.21 2.2nd order bend2nd order bend2nd 2nd order 1storder bendorder tor2nd order bending ing bending ing sion ing4 44 32133.93 2133.93 2133.93 2133.93 1283.13 2133.1950.60 1950.60 1950.60 1950.60 1256.50 1950.eight.59 8.59 eight.59 8.59 two.08 8.Bending-torsion Bending-torsion Bending-torsion 2nd order bendBendingBending-torsion composite composite composite torsioncomposite ing composite5 5 4 552752.60 2752.60 2752.60 2133.93 2752.60 2752.3011.20 3011.20 3011.20 1950.60 3011.20 3011.9.39 9.39 9.39 eight.59 9.39 9.2nd order tor2nd order tor2nd order torBending-torsion 2nd2nd order order torsion sion sion composite torsion sion2752.3.two. Flow Field Modeling and CYMAL-5 medchemexpress Verification 3.two. Flow Field Modeling and Verification three.two. Flow Field Modeling and Verification three.2. Flow Field Modeling and Verification 3.two. Flow Field Modeling and Verification In accordance with the above structural dynamic evaluation, the 9-Amino-6-chloro-2-methoxyacridine Chemical rotating blade produced the According to the above structural dynamic evaluation, the rotating blade made the Based on the above structural dynamic analysis, the rotating blade developed the As outlined by the above structural dynamic torAccordingexcitation to adjust the 2nd orderanalysis, the rotating blade created the to the above analysis, the rotating blade created aerodynamic excitation to structural dynamicdeformation and, additionally, to affectthe aerodynamic excitation to change the blade deformation and, additionally, to impact the aerodynamic adjust the blade deformation and, in addition, to affect the blade the 3011.20 9.39 aerodynamic excitationfatigue damage.blade deformation and, additionally, to was built to change the For that reason, the CFD model from the blade influence the aerodynamic excitation to adjust the bladesion deformation and, furthermore, to affect the vibration response and fatigue harm. As a result, the CFD model from the blade was built vibration response and fatigue harm. As a result, the CFD model in the blade was built vibration response and vibration in Figure 6 fatigue harm. Thus, the CFD model flow field was built blade was constructed vibration response and tofatigue harm. For that reason, excitation. Theof the field parameters as shown response and confirm the aerodynamicthe CFD model flow blade parameters as shown in Figure 6 to confirm the aerodynamic excitation. The of thefield parameters as shown in Figure 6 to.