Onset C (c) 310TCO onset C (c) 425WU 25 /90 C (d) 76/130 61/25 /(e
Onset C (c) 310TCO onset C (c) 425WU 25 /90 C (d) 76/130 61/25 /(e)Tg C (f) 314 -Spec. Imped. cm (g) 17.8 7.Cond. mS/cm (h) 56.three 137.C-BM-1 C-BM-(a)24.7/42.two 18.9/33.Weight ratio in between the blend elements inside the membrane; (b) Average thicknesses; (c) Determined by means of TGA-FTIR coupling, a process described in [47]; (d) WU = water uptake at 25 and 90 C; (e) = water molecules per SO3 H group, calculated based on Equation (2) (see Section two.3.1); (f) Determined through DSC; (g) Impedance determined at r.t. in 0.five N H2 SO4 solution utilizing the Zahner EIS device; (h) Calculated from 1000/cm.Polymers 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW12 of 21 All of the membranes were transparent, indicating miscibility in the blend components, which might be explained by the interactions present inside the blend membranes, including hydrogen bridges and acid ase cross-links (electrostatic interactions) involving the blend components (see Figure six). The membranes listed in Tables components (see Figure six). The membranes listed in Tables 4 and 6 were characterized when it comes to H permeability and overall performance inside a PEMWE AAPK-25 MedChemExpress device. terms of H22permeability and functionality in a PEMWE device.Figure 6. Photographs in the multiblock-co-ionomer membranes: (a)–MBI-LL; (b)–MBI-LS; (c)–the on the multiblock-co-ionomer membranes: (a)–MBI-LL; (b)–MBI-LS; (c)– Figure the ternary blend membrane 3CBM-1. ternary blend membrane 3 CBM-1.three.2. Chosen BMS-986094 Epigenetic Reader Domain characterization results of Those Membranes Which Had been Applied to Electrolysis three.two. Selected Characterization Results of Those Membranes which were Applied to Electrolysis For those of your aromatic membranes that were applied to electrolysis experiments For those in the aromatic membranes that have been applied to electrolysis experiments (the block-co-ionomer membrane MBI-MS plus the blend membrane 3 CBM-2), in-depth block-co-ionomer membrane MBI-MS and the blend membrane 3CBM-2), in-depth (the characterization was performed. The detailed characterization included strain train characterization was performed. The detailed characterization integrated stress train measurement final results, TGA-FTIR coupling experiment final results, and also the determination of proton measurement results, TGA-FTIR coupling experiment outcomes, and also the determination of conductivity in dependence of temperature via the by way of the impedance spectroscopy inside a proton conductivity in dependence of temperature impedance spectroscopy in a Scribner EIS device. device. Below, the these characterizations are presented presented and Scribner EISBelow, the outcomes of benefits of these characterizations are and discussed. discussed. three.two.1. Tension train Measurement Results3 three.2.1.In Figure 7, the strain train curves from the membranes MBI-MS, CBM-2 and, for Anxiety train Measurement Results comparison, Nafion 212, are depicted. In Figure 7, the difference 3in tensile properties In Figure 7, the stress train curves in the membranes MBI-MS, CBM-2 and, for combetween the aromatic polymer membranes and Nafion is clearly indicated: the aromatic parison, Nafion 212, are depicted. In Figure 7, the difference in tensile properties amongst polymer membranes show a greater tensile pressure, but substantially reduced tensile strain than the aromatic polymer membranes and Nafion is clearly indicated: the aromatic polymer Nafion, which confirms strain strain measurement results of other studies, for example [54], and membranes show a larger tensile strain, but a lot decrease tensile strain than Nafion, which which might be explained by the stif.