As well as the hangers around the south side ofside of the model bridge have been preset because the broken hanger separately. The degree south the model bridge were preset as the broken hanger separately. The degree of harm was set set12.five , 25 , 37.5 andand 50 , respectively. EDC17 DC24 belongs to of damage was to to 12.5 , 25 , 37.5 50 , respectively. EDC17 DC24 belongs to the second category, in which harm occurred in two hangers simultaneously. The The dethe second category, in which damage occurred in two hangers simultaneously. degree of damage was also set toset to 12.five , 25 , 37.5 , 50 ,50 , respectively. Table 5 all of the gree of damage was also 12.5 , 25 , 37.5 , and and respectively. Table five lists lists all damage situations investigated within the test model. the damage conditions investigated within the test model.Table 5. Twenty-four damage circumstances regarded by the test model. Table 5. Twenty-four damage situations thought of by the test model.Harm Case No. Harm Case No. EDC 1 EDC 1 EDC five Single hanger failure Single hanger EDC 5 EDC 92 EDC 136 failure EDC 92 EDC 170 Double hanger failure EDC 136 EDC 214 Double hanger EDC 170 failure EDC 214 four.3. Harm Identification Results Damage Kind Damage Type Damage Hanger No. Damage Hanger No. S2 S2 S3 S3 S4 S5 S4 S4 S5 S5 S4 S6 S4 S5 S4 S6 Harm Degree Harm Degree 12.five 25 37.five 50 12.five 25 37.five 50 12.5 25 37.5 50 12.five 25 37.five 50 12.five 25 37.5 50 12.5 25 37.five 50 12.five 25 37.five 50 12.five 25 37.5 50 12.5 25 37.five 50 12.five 25 37.5 50 12.5 25 37.5 50 12.five 25 37.5 50Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW12 of 17 The model cable force was adjusted to about 350 N, and the south hanger cable force 4.three. Damage Identification Results is shown in Figure 11. The cable force is uniform, and this state could be regarded as the The model cable bridge. completed state on the force was adjusted to about 350 N, and also the south hanger cable force is shown in Figure 11. The cable force is uniform, and this state is SC-19220 Autophagy usually regarded as the completed state of your bridge.cable force350Cable force250 200 150 one hundred 50SSSSSSSSSHanger numberFigure Cable force of of south hangers. Figure 11.11. Cable force south hangers.The full damage (the cable force is lowered by one hundred ) every hanger on on south The full harm (the cable force is decreased by one hundred ) ofof every hanger the the sideside was simulatedremoving the damaged hanger itself. The The distinction of dewas simulated by by removing the broken hanger itself. difference of deUCB-5307 Data Sheet flection south in the anchorage point of hanger and tie-beam under wholesome state state and numerous flection at the anchorage point of hanger and tie-beam beneath healthyand a variety of harm circumstances was was obtained, along with the final results are plotted in Figure 12. Then, the dedamage conditionsobtained, and the final results are plotted in Figure 12. Then, the deflection difference influence matrix of the model bridge in this state state was also obtained. flection difference influence matrix in the model bridge in thiswas also obtained.0 lection adjust anchorage point -1 -2 -S1 S2 S3 SAppl. Sci. 2021, 11,The complete damage (the cable force is reduced by 100 ) of every hanger around the south side was simulated by removing the damaged hanger itself. The distinction of deflection in the anchorage point of hanger and tie-beam under healthy state and various harm situations was obtained, plus the benefits are plotted in Figure 12. Then, the de12 of 16 flection distinction influence.