Total calcium (f-CaO Ca(OH)two). Figure 10a shows the f-CaO to 0.83. of CMM-12h and CMM0.5 at six, 9 and 12 h. The initial content of f-CaO within the CMM content The initial content of fCaO in CMM0.5 was 0.229 , although the content decreased from enhanced from 0.299 to 2.285 wt. because the Ca/(SiAl) mass ratio decreased from two.13 to 0.83. 0.096 to 0.027 immediately after autoclave from six h to 12 h. As shown in Figure 10b, the reaction Nevertheless, the content of f-CaO in all samples was reduced than 0.11wt. immediately after autoclaved curing degree of fCaO in CMM0.five at 6, 9 and 12 h of autoclave was 58.52 , 78.60 and 88.21 , for 12 h. It is actually Digoxigenin site apparent from Figure 10b that the reaction degrees of f-CaO in CMM0.five CMM5 respectively. This outcome proves that the hydration reaction of fCaO in CMM0.5 contrib at autoclaved 12 h had been 88.21 , 90.81 , 93.65 , 95.33 , 95.35 and 95.58 , respectively. utes for the formation that it is effective forautoclaved time. This also produce Ca(OH)2 These outcomes indicate of Ca(OH)2 with all the the hydration of f-CaO to explains that the expansion rate of CMM0.5 gradually increases together with the autoclaved time. using the decrease of Ca/(SiAl) mass ratio. This also explains why the expansion rate of CMM-12h increases as the Ca/(SiAl) mass ratio decreases from 2.38 to 0.83.2.Initial content material Content just after Kartogenin supplier autoclavedCCM0.five 0.229 0.229 0.two.bF -CaO reaction degree100 98f-CaOCMM0.58.52 78.6 88.two.1.95.33 93.95.95.1.0.0.9h1.0.12h6h94 92 906h9h12h1.0.90.0.0.229 0.0.88.0.0.0.0.0.0.CCM0.CCMCCMCCMCCMCCMCMM0.CMMCMMCMMCMMCMMSampleSampleFigure ten. The f-CaO content (a) and f-CaO reaction degree (b) of CMM. Figure ten. The fCaO content material (a) and fCaO reaction degree (b) of CMM.three.four. Autoclaved hydration characteristics 3.four.1. XRD 3 representative samples of CMM were examined making use of XRD to investigate theMaterials 2021, 14,10 ofThe initial content of f-CaO in CMM0.5 was 0.229 , whilst the content material decreased from 0.096 to 0.027 soon after autoclave from 6 h to 12 h. As shown in Figure 10b, the reaction degree of f-CaO in CMM0.5 at six, 9 and 12 h of autoclave was 58.52 , 78.60 and 88.21 , respectively. This outcome proves that the hydration reaction of f-CaO in CMM0.5 contributes towards the formation of Ca(OH)two with the autoclaved time. This also explains that the expansion rate of CMM0.5 gradually increases with all the autoclaved time. 3.4. Autoclaved Hydration Characteristics 3.4.1. XRDMaterials 2021, 30, 9112 11 of 21 3 representative samples of CMM were examined employing XRD to investigate the mechanism of compensate for shrinkage. Figure 11 shows the XRD benefits of CMM0, CMM0.5 and CMM5 under autoclave for 12 h. The outcomes in Figure 11 indicate that the diffraction peak intensity corresponding todiffraction is theintensity of Ca(OH)the sum of CaO and OPC hydration. Alongside this, the Ca(OH)two peak highest, which can be two de f-CaO and OPC hydration. Alongside this, the diffraction peak intensity of Ca(OH)two creases progressively with all the Ca/(SiAl) mass ratio from 2.38 to 0.83. decreases steadily with the Ca/(SiAl) mass ratio from 2.38 to 0.83.1-Ca(OH)1CMM0-12h2-Ca2SiO4H2O-CaAl2Si2O7(OH)2H2O4-Al2Si4O10(OH)Intensity2CMM0.5-12h2 26 2 two three 212 25-f-CaO16-Ca3SiO7H2O23CMM5-12hAmorphous aluminosilicate4133 502(Figure 11. XRD benefits of CMM0, CMM0.five and CMM5 at 12 h. Figure 11. XRD results of CMM0, CMM0.5 and CMM5 at 12 h.From Figures 91, these outcomes recommend that the proportion of Ca(OH)two generated From Figures 91, these final results suggest that the proportion of Ca(OH)two generated by fCaO increases gradu.