Every of your three intervals. In Table two we report the median
Each and every of your 3 intervals. In Table 2 we report the median, the initial quartile (Q) and the third quartile (Q3) for each subgroup plus the resultsTable 2. Statistics for egocentric network sizes of diverse trait subgroups. The median, the initial quartile (Q) and also the third quartile (Q3) for every single subgroup are reported. We performed the KruskalWallis test (KW) and the KolmogorovSmirnov test (KS) in an effort to assess eventual variations between the distributions of the reference distances of opposite subgroups (e.g. extroverts and introverts). Only the KruskalWallis (KW) and KolmogorovSmirnov (KS) tests with p 0.05 are reported. Median Openness to Knowledge Extraversion Agreeableness Conscientiousness Emotional Stability High Low High Low High Low High Low Higher Low p 0.05. p 0.0. p 0.00. doi:0.37journal.pone.0730.t002 75.five 86.0 79.0 7.0 80.0 66.0 78.0 67.0 84.0 79.0 Q 53.eight 66.0 60.0 57.0 six.0 54.0 57.0 48.5 60.5 57.0 Q3 89.0 four.0 three.0 90.0 95.0 84.0 92.0 84.0 2.five 99.0 six.five 0.29 four.74 KW KSPLOS One DOI:0.37journal.pone.0730 March two,7 Personality traits and egonetwork dynamicsTable three. Selfdistances of social signatures within subgroups. The median, the first quartile (Q) plus the third quartile (Q3) for every single subgroup are reported. We performed the KruskalWallis test (KW) and also the KolmogorovSmirnov test (KS) so as to assess eventual variations between the distributions of the self distances of opposite subgroups (e.g. extroverts and introverts). Median Openness to Knowledge Extraversion Agreeableness Conscientiousness Emotional Stability High Low Higher Low Higher Low High Low High Low p 0.05. p 0.0. p 0.00. doi:0.37journal.pone.0730.t003 0.02 0.08 0.022 0.08 0.022 0.025 0.020 0.022 0.022 0.09 Q 0.07 0.05 0.09 0.06 0.08 0.05 0.04 0.07 0.07 0.07 Q3 0.04 0.026 0.034 0.022 0.034 0.035 0.033 0.036 0.033 0.024 5.27 KW KSwith a significance amount of p 0.05; for these personality traits, network sizes are drastically distinct for the 25th and 75th percentiles, that is definitely the trait does have an effect on network size. The median values with the network size distribution of subgroups of people today with higher and low scores in the Agreeableness character trait, show statistically substantial differences, with median network sizes of 80.0 and 66.0, respectively. The subgroups of individuals with high and low scores in the Openness to Expertise trait possess a median network size of 75.5 and 86.0, respectively, but they show a substantial statistical difference only together with the KruskalWallis test. Non AM152 web 
important differences are discovered between the subgroups from the other 3 character traits (Extraversion, Conscientiousness and Emotional Stability).Personality traits and the persistence of social signaturesHere, we try to understand the connection between the persistence of a social signature along with the Significant Five personality traits. We investigate irrespective of whether the selfdistances of subgroups of opposite character traits (e.g. extroverts and introverts) exhibit differences, which would indicate that the signatures are extra persistent for one group than for the other. We as a result try to know no matter whether a specific personality disposition influences the stability of a person signature over time. We find a important difference only within the distributions of the selfdistances of the subgroups of extroverts and introverts, namely persons with PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28125238 higher and low scores within the Extraversion character trait: the signatures of extroverts are significantly less persistent than the signatur.