Itioso UniversitParis DescartesAbstractThe present study examines how target group’s stereotype
Itioso UniversitParis DescartesAbstractThe present study examines how target group’s get C.I. 75535 stereotype content (on warmth and competence dimensions) influences subsequent target evaluation following selfthreat related to one’s competence. Participants first received threatening or nonthreatening feedback on their competence. They evaluated then a job candidate who was stereotyped either as competent and cold (Asian) or as warm and incompetent (functioning mother). As predicted, threatened participants derogated only the Asian target on her perceived warmth and her suitability for any job, but didn’t derogate the functioning mother. Additionally, perceived warmth mediated the observed variations within the evaluation with the targets’ job suitability. These outcomes extend analysis on selfthreat and prejudice by which includes Stereotype Content material Model within this hyperlink.Search phrases Selfthreat; Motivation; Stereotyping; Stereotypecontent People’s motivation to preserve a optimistic selfimage has been shown to result in negative evaluations of stereotyped targets. Despite the fact that men and women differ in their chronic motivation to preserve a constructive selfimage, precise events that threaten one’s positive selfimage can activate this motivation. Selfthreat decreases selfesteem (Baumeister Tice, 985) and consequently, individuals engage in approaches to restore their selfesteem and constructive selfimage. Fein and Spencer (997) showed that a single of these tactics contains derogating members of stereotyped group. Which is, selfthreat increases adverse evaluation of stereotyped targets. These authors very first gave participants false adverse (i.e. selfthreatening) or optimistic feedback on an alleged I.Q. test. Participants then evaluated a job candidate who was either Jewish (i.e JAP: “Jewish American Princess”) or Italian. Final results showed that following selfthreat, participants evaluated the Jewish candidate much more negatively than the Italian candidate. This impact was not located following constructive feedback. Though both of those targets are members of stereotyped outgroups, only the Jewish target was derogated. We recommend that not all (stereotyped) targets are suitable to satisfy one’s motivation to restore a good selfimage following a threat. Based on Fein and Spencer, only negatively stereotyped targets (e.g JAP, homosexuals) are most likely to become derogated following selfthreat. As these authors argued, the JAP stereotype is globally speaking more unfavorable than the Italian stereotype. Thus, unfavorable stereotypes may perhaps justify the adverse evaluation of targets (Kunda Spencer, 2003). Nonetheless, as proposed by the Stereotype Content Model (SCM, Fiske, Cuddy, Glick Xu, 2002; Fiske, Xu, Cuddy Glick, 999), many outgroups would be the objects of unfavorable stereotyping, but not for precisely the same purpose. The current work aims to refine the selfthreat stereotype link by including the target stereotype content. This PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25361489 analysis may also refine the SCM by showing that distinct types of selfthreat motivate differential usage of your stereotype content material dimensions.NIHPA Author Manuscript NIHPA Author Manuscript NIHPA Author ManuscriptStereotype Content ModelFiske et al.’s (2002) work revealed that stereotype content varies along two main dimensions: Competence and warmth. Perceived levels of competence and warmth indicate to what extent a group is respected and liked, respectively. Two major sorts of mixed stereotypes can hence be derived: Paternalistic stereotypes contain groups perceived as warm but not competent (e.g housewiv.