), although there have been no differences inside the PT subscale (Mf 25.89 vs
), even though there have been no variations PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18596346 inside the PT subscale (Mf 25.89 vs Mm 24.2; F,320 .65; p 0.28) and within the FS subscale (Mf 24.49 vs Mm 22.45; F,320 two.368; p 0.25; Figure ).BEESStatistical analyses showed important most important effects of both Sex (F,347 three.798; p,0.00) and Lateral Correspondence (F,347 4.023; p,0.05): females scored larger (n 78; M 37.56) than males (n 74; M 8.93), and participants who imagined the action becoming performed with their dominant hand scored larger (n 309; M 29.7) than those who imagined the action being performed with their nondominant hand (n 43; M 22.44). A significant interaction amongst Sex and Lateral Correspondence (F,347 0.467; p,0.005) showed that the earlier final results had been resulting from females who imagined the action becoming performed with their dominant hand scoring substantially greater (n 54; M 39.79) than each of the other groups (females, nondominant: n 24, M 23.25; males, dominant: n 55, M 8.62; males, nondominant: n 9, M 2.42; all ps,0.00; p values adjustedAction Working with scissors Employing a toothbrush Employing a spoonMatches 02 02Mismatches 7 0doi:0.37journal.pone.004595.tPLoS 1 plosone.orgEmpathy Motor IdentificationFigure . Female and male participants’ scores around the IRI subscales (PT: Viewpoint Taking; FS: Fantasy; EC: Empathic Concern; PD: Personal Distress). doi:0.37journal.pone.004595.gwith the TukeyKramer method), when there had been no variations amongst these latter groups (Figure two). Imagination taskWith regard to participants’ responses inside the imagination process, the present final results confirm these of our prior study [3]: ) both righthanders and lefthanders preferentially imagined actions performed with their dominant in lieu of nondominanthand (although this difference was important only for righthanders, possibly because the quantity of lefthanded participants was not sufficient to detect a rather moderate distinction); two) in comparison with lefthanders, righthanders reported a bigger proportion of matches among their dominant hand plus the hand applied by the imagined agent. As already proposed [3], the decrease proportion of matches vs mismatches in lefthanders may be attributed to both their greater visual familiarity with actions performed with their nondominant hand (inducing an incongruence among the visual knowledge of others’ actions and CBR-5884 cost one’sFigure two. BEES scores as a function of Sex and Lateral Correspondence (D: dominant hand; ND: nondominant hand). doi:0.37journal.pone.004595.gPLoS One plosone.orgEmpathy Motor Identificationown experience of selfmade actions) and their reduce typical absolute degree of lateralization, in line with prior research showing handednessrelated variations with regard to motor representations in both behavioral and functional measures [568].Selfreported empathyCompared to males, females exhibited greater empathy scores, along with the difference was particularly important for the emotional element of empathy, as apparent in participants’ responses for the IRI EC subscale plus the BEES. This can be constant with previous study employing selfreport information [59]. Our final results present superior (albeit not comprehensive) help for the hypothesis that participants imagining actions performed with their dominant hand would exhibit higher empathy when compared with those imagining actions performed with their nondominant hand. In fact, the effect of lateral correspondence was due exclusively to girls, simply because female participants who imagined actions performed with their dominant.