Ngest reasons I could in justifying popery’.53 From his newly acquired perspective Tyndall combated religious prejudice, not only that directed by Protestants against Catholics but also the anti-Protestantism adopted by Catholics. Thus he criticized a friend named John Walker, whom he described as `a highly intelligent young fellow and liberal on all points but one–Religion–he is a rigid Catholic.’ Walker, he complained, `is prepared to tilt against protestantism’. Attempting to stand above the time-honoured fray between the two communities, Tyndall proceeded to assert that he was not `a champion of the protestant cause’.54 An 1846 journal entry helps us to appreciate how far he had travelled in the religious odyssey that had begun with his Protestant Irish upbringing. In one journal entry he described July as the `Torin 1 cost notorious “12th”‘ of July, the day when members of the Orange Order celebrate the Protestant victory over the Catholic army of James II at the Battle of the Boyne (1690). It was, he wrote,a day which acts like a caustic on old sores; a day when to their shame be it spoken even surpliced bigots lend their countenance to the commemoration of things which every man with eyes clear enough to behold the universal brotherhood of God’s family must deplore, a day whose associations every lover of his kind must wish swept into irrevocable oblivion!’Five or six years earlier he could not have penned this condemnation of Protestant GSK2256098 side effects arrogance or this call for `universal brotherhood’. For most Irish Catholics Daniel O’Connell was perceived as the Liberator or the Emancipist, while most Protestant contemporaries viewed him as a dangerous revolutionary who sought to spread terror and undermine the Union between England and Ireland. Yet, after O’Connell’s death on 15 May 1847, Tyndall wrote in his journal a lengthy and balanced appreciation. Although critical of O’Connell’s readiness to pursue `the dazzling and the captivating’ and his dishonourable neglect of truth on many occasions, Tyndall nevertheless considered that he had been a major figure in Irish politics and had improved the political condition of the country.56 Although Tyndall’s opposition to Catholicism softened during the mid 1840s, he continued to view the Roman Catholic Church as a highly conservative institution that was authoritarian, repressive and opposed to the progress of knowledge. Moreover, he extended these kinds of criticisms of Catholicism to other religious denominations including the Protestantism into which he had been brought up. In contrast with the personal and non-denominational form of Christianity that he now increasingly encompassed, he seems to have recognized that all institutionalized religions constrained the individual and encouraged uniformity of opinion. Thus one of his principal objections to all such religions was that they imposed limits on individual intellectual freedom.John Tyndall’s religionAnother of Tyndall’s recurrent criticisms of many followers of organized religion was their unerring belief in the correctness of their own views and their prejudice towards any alternative religious principles. He therefore sought to stand above the fray and gain comfort from those who, like himself, could transcend the depressingly familiar and entrenched tribal positions. In this respect he particularly liked and valued Josiah Singleton, a fellow teacher at Queenwood College. According to Tyndall, Singleton was a `deeply pious churchman’–presumably.Ngest reasons I could in justifying popery’.53 From his newly acquired perspective Tyndall combated religious prejudice, not only that directed by Protestants against Catholics but also the anti-Protestantism adopted by Catholics. Thus he criticized a friend named John Walker, whom he described as `a highly intelligent young fellow and liberal on all points but one–Religion–he is a rigid Catholic.’ Walker, he complained, `is prepared to tilt against protestantism’. Attempting to stand above the time-honoured fray between the two communities, Tyndall proceeded to assert that he was not `a champion of the protestant cause’.54 An 1846 journal entry helps us to appreciate how far he had travelled in the religious odyssey that had begun with his Protestant Irish upbringing. In one journal entry he described July as the `notorious “12th”‘ of July, the day when members of the Orange Order celebrate the Protestant victory over the Catholic army of James II at the Battle of the Boyne (1690). It was, he wrote,a day which acts like a caustic on old sores; a day when to their shame be it spoken even surpliced bigots lend their countenance to the commemoration of things which every man with eyes clear enough to behold the universal brotherhood of God’s family must deplore, a day whose associations every lover of his kind must wish swept into irrevocable oblivion!’Five or six years earlier he could not have penned this condemnation of Protestant arrogance or this call for `universal brotherhood’. For most Irish Catholics Daniel O’Connell was perceived as the Liberator or the Emancipist, while most Protestant contemporaries viewed him as a dangerous revolutionary who sought to spread terror and undermine the Union between England and Ireland. Yet, after O’Connell’s death on 15 May 1847, Tyndall wrote in his journal a lengthy and balanced appreciation. Although critical of O’Connell’s readiness to pursue `the dazzling and the captivating’ and his dishonourable neglect of truth on many occasions, Tyndall nevertheless considered that he had been a major figure in Irish politics and had improved the political condition of the country.56 Although Tyndall’s opposition to Catholicism softened during the mid 1840s, he continued to view the Roman Catholic Church as a highly conservative institution that was authoritarian, repressive and opposed to the progress of knowledge. Moreover, he extended these kinds of criticisms of Catholicism to other religious denominations including the Protestantism into which he had been brought up. In contrast with the personal and non-denominational form of Christianity that he now increasingly encompassed, he seems to have recognized that all institutionalized religions constrained the individual and encouraged uniformity of opinion. Thus one of his principal objections to all such religions was that they imposed limits on individual intellectual freedom.John Tyndall’s religionAnother of Tyndall’s recurrent criticisms of many followers of organized religion was their unerring belief in the correctness of their own views and their prejudice towards any alternative religious principles. He therefore sought to stand above the fray and gain comfort from those who, like himself, could transcend the depressingly familiar and entrenched tribal positions. In this respect he particularly liked and valued Josiah Singleton, a fellow teacher at Queenwood College. According to Tyndall, Singleton was a `deeply pious churchman’–presumably.