Ailure in treatment was defined as individuals who MedChemExpress 11089-65-9 required continual antibiotic treatment after intensification of antibiotic therapy for 7 days. Some NT 157 web patients (61 cases) were reexamined within 12?8 months after discharge.Measurement of inflammatory mediatorsThe concentrations of serum and sputum SAA (56-SAA HUE02), CRP (DCRP00), MMP-9 (DMP900), and IL-6 (D6050; R D Systems; USA) were determined by ELISA using specific kits, according to the manufacturers’ instructions (ALPCO; Netherlands, R D Systems; USA) [18?0]. The detection limitations were 200 ng/ml for SAA, 50 ng/ml for CRP, 20 ng/ml for MMP-9, and 300 pg/ml for IL-6.Statistics Induction and processing of sputum samplesInduction and collection of sputum samples from individual patients were performed, as described previously [12]. Briefly, a high output ultrasonic nebulizer (ULTRA-NEBTM Model 2000, De Vilbiss Healthcare, Somerset, PA, USA) with a Hans Rudolph 2-way valve box (Hans Rudolph, Shawnee, KS, USA) and tubing were used for delivering saline in doubling time periods from 0.5 sec to 4 min. HDAC-IN-3 Following baseline spirometry, individualThe distribution of individual groups of data was analyzed. SPSS17.0 was used for statistical analysis. If the data were normally distributed, they are expressed as the mean and standard deviation (SD) and analyzed by ANOVA test with Bonferroni correction or Student’s t-test. If the data were not normally distributed, they were reported as the median and interquartile range (IQR) and analyzed by Kruskall-Wallis test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical 18204824 variables were analyzed by Chi squared test. All of the statisticalSputum Cellular Phenotypes in AECOPDTable 2. Clinical characteristics of AECOPD patients.Eosinophilic N Age (years) BODE score GOLD II GOLD III GOLD IV Post-FEV1 (L) Post-FEV1/pred ( ) FEV1/FVC ( ) Bacteria Virus Volume of sputum (mL) symptom recovery time (days) Lengths of hospital stay (days) intensification of drug therapy Blood leukocytes (109/L) Blood neutrophils (109/L) Blood eosinophils (10 /L) Total cell count (106/mL) neutrophils (106/mL) eosinophils (10 /mL) AN 3199 macrophages (106/mL) lymphocytes (106/mL) epithelial cells (106/mL) Squamous cells (106/mL)6Neutrophilic 36 65.9610.5 5.5(4?)+ 5 19 12 1.2460.52 38.569.8` 59.367.0 31 (86 )`1″ 7 (19 ) 23(16?1)*+ 11.0 (9?5)* 13 (36 )` 15.3(9.8?1)*+ 12.7(8.2?6.2)*++{ +Mixed granulocytic 5 66.4611.4 6(4.5?.5)+ 0 1 4 0.6160.06`| 22.865.0` 56.165.9 2(40 ) 1(20 ) 22(17?9)*+ 12.0 (6.5?0)*+ 16 (7.5?2.5)*+ 2 (40 ) 16.1(10.1?8.4)*+ 12.0(8.5?5.9)*+ 0.98(0.86?.45)+{Paucigranulocytic 32 62.8610.0 1(0.3?.8) 7 25 0 1.3460.53 46.7618.3 58.768.5 2(6 ) 5(16 ) 15(7.5?1) 5.5 (1.3?) 8.5 (5.3?1) 2 (6.3 ) 11.4(8.9?4.1) 7.4(6.3?1.5) 0.13(0?.35) 1.3(0.8?.9) 0.3(0.1?.7) 0.0(0.0?.0) 1.2(0.6?.9) 0.0(0.0?.01) 0.4(0.2?.8) 0.4(0.2?.0)10 64.8611.9 6(5?.25)+ 0 6 4 0.9960.20` 31.465.1` 57.3612.3 1 (10 ) 3 (30 ) 12(6.5?6) 6.0 (4.8?.3) 8.0 (7.8?1.5) 1 (10 ) 10.5(8.5?4.2) 7.1(5.5?.8) 0.96(0.74?.62) 3.6(2.1?.6)+ 1.0(0.7?.5)+ 0.4(0.2?.0) 1.2(0.6?.8) 0.0(0.0?.02) 0.3(0.1?.8) 0.1(0.0?.5)+{12 (10.3?6.8)*+0.24(0.1?.41) 23.3(10.7?2.8)+* 20.8(9.7?7.2)+* 0.1(0.0?.3) 1.9(0.9?.5) 0.0(0.0?.66) 0.7(0.4?.2) 0.6(0.2?.0)+25.5(19.5?4.9)+* 19.4(15.5?8.9)+* 2.2(1.2?.9)+{ 4.5(2.0?3.5)+*{ 0.0(0.0?.02) 1.2(0.45?.8) 0.2(0.15?.6)Data are expressed as mean 6 SD or median (IQR). The difference among groups was determined by ANOVA, Kruskall-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U test or Chi square. *P,0.01 vs. the Eosinophilic AECOPD; +P,0.01 vs. the Paucigranu.Ailure in treatment was defined as individuals who required continual antibiotic treatment after intensification of antibiotic therapy for 7 days. Some patients (61 cases) were reexamined within 12?8 months after discharge.Measurement of inflammatory mediatorsThe concentrations of serum and sputum SAA (56-SAA HUE02), CRP (DCRP00), MMP-9 (DMP900), and IL-6 (D6050; R D Systems; USA) were determined by ELISA using specific kits, according to the manufacturers’ instructions (ALPCO; Netherlands, R D Systems; USA) [18?0]. The detection limitations were 200 ng/ml for SAA, 50 ng/ml for CRP, 20 ng/ml for MMP-9, and 300 pg/ml for IL-6.Statistics Induction and processing of sputum samplesInduction and collection of sputum samples from individual patients were performed, as described previously [12]. Briefly, a high output ultrasonic nebulizer (ULTRA-NEBTM Model 2000, De Vilbiss Healthcare, Somerset, PA, USA) with a Hans Rudolph 2-way valve box (Hans Rudolph, Shawnee, KS, USA) and tubing were used for delivering saline in doubling time periods from 0.5 sec to 4 min. Following baseline spirometry, individualThe distribution of individual groups of data was analyzed. SPSS17.0 was used for statistical analysis. If the data were normally distributed, they are expressed as the mean and standard deviation (SD) and analyzed by ANOVA test with Bonferroni correction or Student’s t-test. If the data were not normally distributed, they were reported as the median and interquartile range (IQR) and analyzed by Kruskall-Wallis test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical 18204824 variables were analyzed by Chi squared test. All of the statisticalSputum Cellular Phenotypes in AECOPDTable 2. Clinical characteristics of AECOPD patients.Eosinophilic N Age (years) BODE score GOLD II GOLD III GOLD IV Post-FEV1 (L) Post-FEV1/pred ( ) FEV1/FVC ( ) Bacteria Virus Volume of sputum (mL) symptom recovery time (days) Lengths of hospital stay (days) intensification of drug therapy Blood leukocytes (109/L) Blood neutrophils (109/L) Blood eosinophils (10 /L) Total cell count (106/mL) neutrophils (106/mL) eosinophils (10 /mL) macrophages (106/mL) lymphocytes (106/mL) epithelial cells (106/mL) Squamous cells (106/mL)6Neutrophilic 36 65.9610.5 5.5(4?)+ 5 19 12 1.2460.52 38.569.8` 59.367.0 31 (86 )`1″ 7 (19 ) 23(16?1)*+ 11.0 (9?5)* 13 (36 )` 15.3(9.8?1)*+ 12.7(8.2?6.2)*++{ +Mixed granulocytic 5 66.4611.4 6(4.5?.5)+ 0 1 4 0.6160.06`| 22.865.0` 56.165.9 2(40 ) 1(20 ) 22(17?9)*+ 12.0 (6.5?0)*+ 16 (7.5?2.5)*+ 2 (40 ) 16.1(10.1?8.4)*+ 12.0(8.5?5.9)*+ 0.98(0.86?.45)+{Paucigranulocytic 32 62.8610.0 1(0.3?.8) 7 25 0 1.3460.53 46.7618.3 58.768.5 2(6 ) 5(16 ) 15(7.5?1) 5.5 (1.3?) 8.5 (5.3?1) 2 (6.3 ) 11.4(8.9?4.1) 7.4(6.3?1.5) 0.13(0?.35) 1.3(0.8?.9) 0.3(0.1?.7) 0.0(0.0?.0) 1.2(0.6?.9) 0.0(0.0?.01) 0.4(0.2?.8) 0.4(0.2?.0)10 64.8611.9 6(5?.25)+ 0 6 4 0.9960.20` 31.465.1` 57.3612.3 1 (10 ) 3 (30 ) 12(6.5?6) 6.0 (4.8?.3) 8.0 (7.8?1.5) 1 (10 ) 10.5(8.5?4.2) 7.1(5.5?.8) 0.96(0.74?.62) 3.6(2.1?.6)+ 1.0(0.7?.5)+ 0.4(0.2?.0) 1.2(0.6?.8) 0.0(0.0?.02) 0.3(0.1?.8) 0.1(0.0?.5)+{12 (10.3?6.8)*+0.24(0.1?.41) 23.3(10.7?2.8)+* 20.8(9.7?7.2)+* 0.1(0.0?.3) 1.9(0.9?.5) 0.0(0.0?.66) 0.7(0.4?.2) 0.6(0.2?.0)+25.5(19.5?4.9)+* 19.4(15.5?8.9)+* 2.2(1.2?.9)+{ 4.5(2.0?3.5)+*{ 0.0(0.0?.02) 1.2(0.45?.8) 0.2(0.15?.6)Data are expressed as mean 6 SD or median (IQR). The difference among groups was determined by ANOVA, Kruskall-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U test or Chi square. *P,0.01 vs. the Eosinophilic AECOPD; +P,0.01 vs. the Paucigranu.Ailure in treatment was defined as individuals who required continual antibiotic treatment after intensification of antibiotic therapy for 7 days. Some patients (61 cases) were reexamined within 12?8 months after discharge.Measurement of inflammatory mediatorsThe concentrations of serum and sputum SAA (56-SAA HUE02), CRP (DCRP00), MMP-9 (DMP900), and IL-6 (D6050; R D Systems; USA) were determined by ELISA using specific kits, according to the manufacturers’ instructions (ALPCO; Netherlands, R D Systems; USA) [18?0]. The detection limitations were 200 ng/ml for SAA, 50 ng/ml for CRP, 20 ng/ml for MMP-9, and 300 pg/ml for IL-6.Statistics Induction and processing of sputum samplesInduction and collection of sputum samples from individual patients were performed, as described previously [12]. Briefly, a high output ultrasonic nebulizer (ULTRA-NEBTM Model 2000, De Vilbiss Healthcare, Somerset, PA, USA) with a Hans Rudolph 2-way valve box (Hans Rudolph, Shawnee, KS, USA) and tubing were used for delivering saline in doubling time periods from 0.5 sec to 4 min. Following baseline spirometry, individualThe distribution of individual groups of data was analyzed. SPSS17.0 was used for statistical analysis. If the data were normally distributed, they are expressed as the mean and standard deviation (SD) and analyzed by ANOVA test with Bonferroni correction or Student’s t-test. If the data were not normally distributed, they were reported as the median and interquartile range (IQR) and analyzed by Kruskall-Wallis test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical 18204824 variables were analyzed by Chi squared test. All of the statisticalSputum Cellular Phenotypes in AECOPDTable 2. Clinical characteristics of AECOPD patients.Eosinophilic N Age (years) BODE score GOLD II GOLD III GOLD IV Post-FEV1 (L) Post-FEV1/pred ( ) FEV1/FVC ( ) Bacteria Virus Volume of sputum (mL) symptom recovery time (days) Lengths of hospital stay (days) intensification of drug therapy Blood leukocytes (109/L) Blood neutrophils (109/L) Blood eosinophils (10 /L) Total cell count (106/mL) neutrophils (106/mL) eosinophils (10 /mL) macrophages (106/mL) lymphocytes (106/mL) epithelial cells (106/mL) Squamous cells (106/mL)6Neutrophilic 36 65.9610.5 5.5(4?)+ 5 19 12 1.2460.52 38.569.8` 59.367.0 31 (86 )`1″ 7 (19 ) 23(16?1)*+ 11.0 (9?5)* 13 (36 )` 15.3(9.8?1)*+ 12.7(8.2?6.2)*++{ +Mixed granulocytic 5 66.4611.4 6(4.5?.5)+ 0 1 4 0.6160.06`| 22.865.0` 56.165.9 2(40 ) 1(20 ) 22(17?9)*+ 12.0 (6.5?0)*+ 16 (7.5?2.5)*+ 2 (40 ) 16.1(10.1?8.4)*+ 12.0(8.5?5.9)*+ 0.98(0.86?.45)+{Paucigranulocytic 32 62.8610.0 1(0.3?.8) 7 25 0 1.3460.53 46.7618.3 58.768.5 2(6 ) 5(16 ) 15(7.5?1) 5.5 (1.3?) 8.5 (5.3?1) 2 (6.3 ) 11.4(8.9?4.1) 7.4(6.3?1.5) 0.13(0?.35) 1.3(0.8?.9) 0.3(0.1?.7) 0.0(0.0?.0) 1.2(0.6?.9) 0.0(0.0?.01) 0.4(0.2?.8) 0.4(0.2?.0)10 64.8611.9 6(5?.25)+ 0 6 4 0.9960.20` 31.465.1` 57.3612.3 1 (10 ) 3 (30 ) 12(6.5?6) 6.0 (4.8?.3) 8.0 (7.8?1.5) 1 (10 ) 10.5(8.5?4.2) 7.1(5.5?.8) 0.96(0.74?.62) 3.6(2.1?.6)+ 1.0(0.7?.5)+ 0.4(0.2?.0) 1.2(0.6?.8) 0.0(0.0?.02) 0.3(0.1?.8) 0.1(0.0?.5)+{12 (10.3?6.8)*+0.24(0.1?.41) 23.3(10.7?2.8)+* 20.8(9.7?7.2)+* 0.1(0.0?.3) 1.9(0.9?.5) 0.0(0.0?.66) 0.7(0.4?.2) 0.6(0.2?.0)+25.5(19.5?4.9)+* 19.4(15.5?8.9)+* 2.2(1.2?.9)+{ 4.5(2.0?3.5)+*{ 0.0(0.0?.02) 1.2(0.45?.8) 0.2(0.15?.6)Data are expressed as mean 6 SD or median (IQR). The difference among groups was determined by ANOVA, Kruskall-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U test or Chi square. *P,0.01 vs. the Eosinophilic AECOPD; +P,0.01 vs. the Paucigranu.Ailure in treatment was defined as individuals who required continual antibiotic treatment after intensification of antibiotic therapy for 7 days. Some patients (61 cases) were reexamined within 12?8 months after discharge.Measurement of inflammatory mediatorsThe concentrations of serum and sputum SAA (56-SAA HUE02), CRP (DCRP00), MMP-9 (DMP900), and IL-6 (D6050; R D Systems; USA) were determined by ELISA using specific kits, according to the manufacturers’ instructions (ALPCO; Netherlands, R D Systems; USA) [18?0]. The detection limitations were 200 ng/ml for SAA, 50 ng/ml for CRP, 20 ng/ml for MMP-9, and 300 pg/ml for IL-6.Statistics Induction and processing of sputum samplesInduction and collection of sputum samples from individual patients were performed, as described previously [12]. Briefly, a high output ultrasonic nebulizer (ULTRA-NEBTM Model 2000, De Vilbiss Healthcare, Somerset, PA, USA) with a Hans Rudolph 2-way valve box (Hans Rudolph, Shawnee, KS, USA) and tubing were used for delivering saline in doubling time periods from 0.5 sec to 4 min. Following baseline spirometry, individualThe distribution of individual groups of data was analyzed. SPSS17.0 was used for statistical analysis. If the data were normally distributed, they are expressed as the mean and standard deviation (SD) and analyzed by ANOVA test with Bonferroni correction or Student’s t-test. If the data were not normally distributed, they were reported as the median and interquartile range (IQR) and analyzed by Kruskall-Wallis test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical 18204824 variables were analyzed by Chi squared test. All of the statisticalSputum Cellular Phenotypes in AECOPDTable 2. Clinical characteristics of AECOPD patients.Eosinophilic N Age (years) BODE score GOLD II GOLD III GOLD IV Post-FEV1 (L) Post-FEV1/pred ( ) FEV1/FVC ( ) Bacteria Virus Volume of sputum (mL) symptom recovery time (days) Lengths of hospital stay (days) intensification of drug therapy Blood leukocytes (109/L) Blood neutrophils (109/L) Blood eosinophils (10 /L) Total cell count (106/mL) neutrophils (106/mL) eosinophils (10 /mL) macrophages (106/mL) lymphocytes (106/mL) epithelial cells (106/mL) Squamous cells (106/mL)6Neutrophilic 36 65.9610.5 5.5(4?)+ 5 19 12 1.2460.52 38.569.8` 59.367.0 31 (86 )`1″ 7 (19 ) 23(16?1)*+ 11.0 (9?5)* 13 (36 )` 15.3(9.8?1)*+ 12.7(8.2?6.2)*++{ +Mixed granulocytic 5 66.4611.4 6(4.5?.5)+ 0 1 4 0.6160.06`| 22.865.0` 56.165.9 2(40 ) 1(20 ) 22(17?9)*+ 12.0 (6.5?0)*+ 16 (7.5?2.5)*+ 2 (40 ) 16.1(10.1?8.4)*+ 12.0(8.5?5.9)*+ 0.98(0.86?.45)+{Paucigranulocytic 32 62.8610.0 1(0.3?.8) 7 25 0 1.3460.53 46.7618.3 58.768.5 2(6 ) 5(16 ) 15(7.5?1) 5.5 (1.3?) 8.5 (5.3?1) 2 (6.3 ) 11.4(8.9?4.1) 7.4(6.3?1.5) 0.13(0?.35) 1.3(0.8?.9) 0.3(0.1?.7) 0.0(0.0?.0) 1.2(0.6?.9) 0.0(0.0?.01) 0.4(0.2?.8) 0.4(0.2?.0)10 64.8611.9 6(5?.25)+ 0 6 4 0.9960.20` 31.465.1` 57.3612.3 1 (10 ) 3 (30 ) 12(6.5?6) 6.0 (4.8?.3) 8.0 (7.8?1.5) 1 (10 ) 10.5(8.5?4.2) 7.1(5.5?.8) 0.96(0.74?.62) 3.6(2.1?.6)+ 1.0(0.7?.5)+ 0.4(0.2?.0) 1.2(0.6?.8) 0.0(0.0?.02) 0.3(0.1?.8) 0.1(0.0?.5)+{12 (10.3?6.8)*+0.24(0.1?.41) 23.3(10.7?2.8)+* 20.8(9.7?7.2)+* 0.1(0.0?.3) 1.9(0.9?.5) 0.0(0.0?.66) 0.7(0.4?.2) 0.6(0.2?.0)+25.5(19.5?4.9)+* 19.4(15.5?8.9)+* 2.2(1.2?.9)+{ 4.5(2.0?3.5)+*{ 0.0(0.0?.02) 1.2(0.45?.8) 0.2(0.15?.6)Data are expressed as mean 6 SD or median (IQR). The difference among groups was determined by ANOVA, Kruskall-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U test or Chi square. *P,0.01 vs. the Eosinophilic AECOPD; +P,0.01 vs. the Paucigranu.